Program
Three documentation points for the training program.
For healthcare educators and clinical training leaders
FeedbackRx Coach helps make giving feedback in clinical training programs simple, useful, and a learning conversation.
Training program workflow
Before
Prepare the conversation
During
Guide a learning conversation
After
Summarize next steps
Simple output
Clear action points. Better coaching. Stronger programs.
Simple recording flow
The goal is a simple clinical workflow: start the conversation, confirm names and consent, stop when finished, and let FeedbackRx create the right outputs.
Press the green button, enter faculty and learner names, and confirm consent.
When the feedback conversation is finished, press the red button to stop recording.
FeedbackRx sends the right summary to the program, both individuals, and faculty coaching.
Names
Consent
After stop: 3 outputs
Three documentation points for the training program.
Clear action points for both people in the conversation.
Glow, grow, and tip coaching for the next conversation.
The problem
Feedback gets squeezed between patient care, teaching demands, and administrative follow-up.
Learners leave with mixed signals when conversations are too vague, too rushed, or too hard to hear.
Faculty are expected to coach well, but rarely receive feedback on their own feedback conversations.
Programs need reliable documentation without turning educators into note-takers.
How it works
01
Choose the goal, learner context, and conversation frame before the feedback moment.
02
Use evidence-informed communication feedback frameworks to make the conversation clear and collaborative.
03
Turn the encounter into useful action points for the learner, faculty member, and training program.
04
Give faculty a private review that helps them improve their next feedback conversation.
Features
Designed for short windows between clinic, rounds, simulation, handoffs, and program meetings.
Distills feedback into specific behaviors, commitments, and follow-up steps learners can actually use.
Helps educators notice patterns in clarity, empathy, inquiry, and psychological safety.
Creates concise summaries that support training oversight, coaching records, and compliance workflows.
Planned for HIPAA-conscious workflows, SOC 2 readiness, access controls, and protected data handling.
Supports direct, respectful learning conversations instead of vague praise or delayed correction.
Product mockup
A lightweight preview of how faculty could move from prep, to reflection, to structured coaching summaries and growth plans.
Who is it for
Graduate medical education residency and fellowship programs
Advanced practice provider training programs for NP and PA learners
Undergraduate medical education programs and clerkship directors
Program directors, associate program directors, and clinical competency committees
Clinical faculty, simulation faculty, preceptors, and team leaders
Students, residents, fellows, trainees, and interprofessional learners
Product preview
After a feedback conversation, FeedbackRx Coach can organize the main points into learner actions, faculty follow-up, and concise program documentation.
Feedback Summary
Learner
Two concrete practice goals and a follow-up plan.
Faculty
Coaching note on clarity, inquiry, and tone.
Program
Three key documentation points for review.
Early access
Share a few details about your program so the pilot experience can be shaped around real clinical education needs.
FAQ
The product is being designed around Ask-Tell-Ask, Situation-Behavior-Impact, Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation, advocacy-inquiry, coaching questions, psychological safety, and high-stakes empathy. The goal is not to force one script, but to help faculty choose the right structure for the moment.
That is the intended launch standard. Before real conversations or protected information are handled, the product would need HIPAA-aligned policies, security controls, vendor review, audit trails, access controls, and a SOC 2 readiness path.
The intended workflow produces a learner-facing action summary, a faculty-facing coaching review, and a concise program-facing summary for documentation.
No. It is for everyday coaching, formative feedback, simulation debriefing, professionalism conversations, remediation support, and high-stakes conversations where clarity and trust both matter.
References
Conversation Review
Faculty can review what helped, what may have been unclear, and how to make the next conversation more specific, empathic, and learner-centered.
Faculty review
Clarity
88%
Specific behavior named before advice
Empathy
76%
Learner emotion acknowledged
Action
92%
Next step confirmed with learner